![respondus lockdown browser download auburn respondus lockdown browser download auburn](https://s3.amazonaws.com/cdn.freshdesk.com/data/helpdesk/attachments/production/12077849769/original/xVfWpJJusx4_NiAwT0Ib1xW9zEFHw1y_kg.png)
Students have raised privacy and security concerns too. Davis offers professors the use of proctoring software, it does so as a last resort, encouraging them to find alternate means of assessment before using the software. An economics professor at Harvard said, “I just didn’t think it was appropriate to sort of introduce that level of intrusion of technological intrusion into the test taking process.” And while U.C. In other cases, some universities and individual professors are discouraging the use of proctoring software even if it is available. Berkeley’s decision not to expand online exam proctoring at this time was due, in part, to their belief “that current options do not satisfy university policies related to privacy.” Similarly, one faculty member said that U.C. For example, Duke University decided against online proctoring this semester, in part because of security concerns. As a result, some universities have decided against these solutions, at least for now. That was the main concern for faculty at U.C. Of course, faculty and students are raising concerns about privacy and security. Students have also expressed their concerns in articles published by local and campus newspapers across the country. There are at least a dozen student petitions on calling for their universities to stop using online proctoring services. Since that time, students and faculty in the United States and around the world have continued to raise concerns. The letter remains on the website of the Council of University of California Faculty Associations, however. The move provoked a response from ProctorU’s attorney, claiming the professors had defamed the company, among other allegations, and demanding the letter be taken down. Desperate times call for desperate measures.” Not So Fast, Say Students And FacultyĪs early as mid-March, the University of California Santa Barbara Faculty Association raised concerns with university administration about ProctorU’s data collection, retention, and sharing practices. The Post reported, for example, that Chris Dayley of Utah State University “described the software with a laugh as ‘sort of like spyware that we just legitimize.’” An administrator at Auburn University justified the use of such tools to the Post by saying, “It’s a crisis situation. In the world of higher education, some also see it as spyware, but think that’s O.K.